Data, Models and Morphisms: On Suppes’s Intuitive Structuralism

Authors

  • José Luis Rolleri Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me4.122

Keywords:

models of data, partial substructure, intended interpretation, empirical content

Abstract

In this paper I analyze certain concepts of Patrick Suppes’ intuitive structuralism, in particular that of model of data, in order to give a reply to Muller’s critique to Suppes that the set-theoretical axiomatization of a physical theory involves the loss of its empirical content. With that intention, before, I try a formal improvement of Suppes’ propose on how the models of experiments are connected with thetheoretical models.

References

Balzer, W. (1997), Teorías empíricas: modelos, estructuras y ejemplos, Madrid: Alianza.(Edición revisada por el autor y traducción castellana de Agustín González Ruiz de: Empirische Theorien: Modelle–Strukturen–Beispiele, Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1982.)

Balzer, W. (1992), “The Structuralist View of Measurement: An Extension of Received Measurement Theories”, en Savage, C.W. y P. Ehrlich (eds.), Philosophical and Foundational Issues in Measurement Theory, Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 93-117.

Batitsky, V. (1998), “Empiricism and the Myth of Fundamental Measurement”, Synthese116(1): 51-73.

Carnap, R. (1956), “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts”, en Feigl, H. y M. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 38-76.

Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes P. y A. Tversky (1971), Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1, NuevaYork: Academic Press.

Moulines, C.U. (2011), “Cuatro tipos de desarrollo teórico en las ciencias empíricas”, Metatheoria1(2): 11-27.

Muller, F.A. (2011), “Reflections on the Revolution at Stanford”, Synthese183(1): 87-114.

Suppes, P. (1988a), “Una comparación del significado y los usos de los modelos en las matemáticas y las ciencias empíricas”, en Suppes, P., Estudios de filosofía y metodología de la ciencia, Madrid: Alianza, pp. 109-123.(Traducción castellana de Mario Alberto Cortez Rodríguezde: “A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences”,Synthese12(1960):287-301.)

Suppes, P. (1988b), “Modelos de datos”, en Suppes, P., Estudios de filosofía y metodología de la ciencia, Madrid: Alianza, pp. 147-159.(Traducción castellana de Mario Alberto Cortez Rodríguezde: “Models of Data”, enNagel, E.,Suppes, P. yA. Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress,Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1962, pp. 252-261.)

Suppes, P. (1988c), “La estructura de las teorías y el análisis de datos”, en Suppes, P., Estudiosde filosofía y metodología de la ciencia, Madrid: Alianza, pp. 125-145.(Traducción castellana de Pilar Castrillo y Eloy Radade: “The Structure of Theories and the Analysis of Data”, en Suppe,F. (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press, 1974, pp. 266-283.)

Suppes, P. (2011), “Future Development of Scientific Structures Closer to Experiments: Response to F.A. Muller”, Synthese183(1): 115-126.

Published

2014-04-01

How to Cite

Rolleri, J. L. (2014). Data, Models and Morphisms: On Suppes’s Intuitive Structuralism. Metatheoria – Journal of Philosophy and History of Science, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me4.122

Issue

Section

Articles