Dos usos de los modelos de optimalidad en las explicaciones por selección natural
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me8.161Palavras-chave:
optimalidad, selección natural, fitness, teoría del forrajeo óptimoResumo
El objetivo de este trabajo consiste en analizar las relaciones entre los modelos de optimalidad y la selección natural. Defenderemos que esas relaciones pueden dividirse en dos tipos, en tanto hay dos tipos de explicaciones seleccionistas, que llamaremos “históricas” y “ahistóricas”. Las explicaciones históricas revelan como una población dada adquiere un rasgo que es adaptativo en ese ambiente e involucran muchas generaciones, variación, etc. Las explicaciones ahistóricas, explican por qué, en determinado momento, ciertos tipos de organismos tienen un mayor éxito reproductivo que otros. Mostraremos que los modelos de optimalidad pueden jugar un rol en la determinación del explanandum de las explicaciones histórica seleccionistas, esto es, que ayudan a reconocer qué rasgos son adaptativos. Por otra parte, mostramos que los modelos de optimalidad nos permiten determinar a veces la parte del explanans de las explicaciones ahistóricas (particularmente, el concepto de fitness).
Referências
Beatty, J. (1980), “Optimal-Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology”, Philosophy of Science47 (4): 532-561.
Blanco, D. (2008), “La naturaleza de las adaptaciones en la teología natural británica: análisis historiográfico y consecuencias metateóricas”, Ludus Vitalis16(30): 3-26.
Bolduc, J.-S.y F.Cézilly (2012), “Optimality Modelling in the Real World”, Biology & Philosophy27(6): 851-869.
Brandon, R. (1978), “Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science9: 181-206.
Brandon, R. (1990), Adaptation and Environment, Princeton, New Yersey: Princeton University Press.
Brandon, R. y J.Beatty (1984), “The Propensity Interpretation of ‘Fitness’-No interpretation Is No Substitute”, Philosophy of Science51(2): 342-347.
Brandon, R. (2006), “The Principle of Drift: Biology's First Law”, The Journal of Philosophy103(7): 319-335.
Burian, R.M. (1994), “Adaptation: Historical Perspectives”, en Keller, E.F. y E.A. Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 7-12.
Casanueva, M. (2011), “A Structuralist Reconstruction of the Mechanism of Natural Selection in Set Theory and Graph Formats”, en Martinez Contreras, J. y A. Ponce de León (eds.), Darwin’s Evolving Legacy, México: Siglo XXI, pp. 177-192.
Darwin, C. (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. (1872), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, 6thedition, London: John Murray.
Endler, J.A. (1986), Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton,New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ginnobili, S. (2010), “La teoría de la selección natural darwiniana”, Theoria25(1): 37-58.
Ginnobili, S. (2014), “Explicaciones seleccionistas históricas y ahistóricas”, Ludus Vitalis, 33:21-41.
Ginnobili, S. y D. Blanco (2007), “Gould y Lewontin contra el programa adaptacionista: elucidación de críticas”, Scientiae Studia5(1): 35-48.
Ginnobili, S. (2016), “Missing Concepts in Natural Selection Theory Reconstructions”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences38(8): 2-33.
Gould, S.J. y R.C. Lewontin (1979), “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London205: 581-598.
Gould, S.J. y E. Vrba (1982), “Exaptation-A Missing Term in the Science of Form”, Paleobiology8(1): 4-15.
Gray, R.D. (1987), “Faith and Foraging: A Critique of the “Paradigm Argument from Design.”, en Kamil, A.C., Krebs,J.R. y H.R. Pulliam (eds.), Foraging Behavior, New York: Springer US, pp. 69-140.
Henry, D. (2013), “Optimality and Teleology in Aristotle’s Natural Science”,en Inwood, B.(ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. XLV, pp. 225-263.
Holling, C.S. (1964), “The Analysis of Complex Population Processes”, The Canadian Entomologist96(1-2): 335-347.
Kettlewell, H.B.D. (1955), “Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera”, Heredity9: 323-342.
Kettlewell, H.B.D. (1956), “Further Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera”, Heredity10(3): 287-301.
Kitcher, P. (1993), “Function and Design”, en Kitcher, P.(ed.), In Mendel’s Mirror:Philosophical Reflectionson Biology, Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 159-176.
Kirby, W. (1836), On the Power, Wisdom and Goodness of God, as Manifested in the Creation of Animals, and in their History, Habits and Instincts, Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.
Krebs, J., Erichsen, J., Webber, M. y E.Charnov (1977), “Optimal Prey Selection in the Great Tit (Parus major)”, Animal Behaviour25(1): 30-38. Krebs, J.R., Kacelnik, A. y P.Taylor (1978), “Test of Optimal Sampling by Foraging Great Tits”, Nature275(5675): 27-31.
Lloyd, E.A. (1994), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory,New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Millstein, R.L. (en prensa),“Probability in Biology: The Case of Fitness”, en Hájek, A. yC.R. Hitchcock (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accesible en:http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10901/.
Paley, W. (1809), Natural Theology,12thedition, London: J. Faulder.
Pierce, G.J.y J.G. Ollason (1987),“Eight Reasons Why Optimal Foraging Theory Is a Complete Waste of Time”, Oikos49(1): 111-118.
Popper, K. (1979), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach,2ndedition, Oxford: Clarendon.
Potochnik, A. (2009), “Optimality Modeling in a Suboptimal World”, Biology &Philosophy24(2): 183-197.
Rice, C. (2012), “Optimality Explanations: A Plea for an Alternative Approach”, Biology &Philosophy27(5): 685-703.
Ridley, M. (1996), Evolution,2ndedition, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science.
Ridley, M. (2004), Evolution, 3rdedition, Malden: Blackwell.
Roffé, A. (2016), La genética de poblaciones y las fuerzas evolutivas, Tesis de licenciatura, Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Schoener, T.W. (1974), “The Compression Hypothesis and Temporal Resource Partitioning”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America71(10): 4169–4172.
Skipper, R.A. y R.L. Millstein (2005), “Thinking About Evolutionary Mechanisms: Natural Selection”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences36: 237-347.
Smart, J.J.C. (1963), Philosophy and Scientific Realism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Smith, J.M. (1978), “Optimization Theory in Evolution”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics9: 31-56.
Sober, E. (2000), Philosophy of Biology, 2ndedition, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Stegmann, U.E. (2010), “What can Natural Selection Explain?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences41: 61-66.
Stephens, C. (2007), “Natural Selection”, en Matthen, M. y C. Stephens (eds.), Philosophy of Biology, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 111-127.
West-Eberhard, M.J. (1994): “Adaptation:Current Usages”, en Keller, E.F. y E.A. Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 13-8.
Williams, M.B. (1970), “Deducing the Consequences of Evolution: A Mathematical Model”, Journal of Theoretical Biology29(3): 343-385.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Metatheoria – Revista de Filosofia e História da CiênciaOs documentos publicados aqui são regidos pelos critérios de licenciamento Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5
