Structuralist Analysis of Anomie Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me4.123Keywords:
philosophy of science, metatheoretical structuralism, Robert K. Merton, anomie theoryAbstract
Although we may find the concept of anomie in Greek thought, it is since Durkheim that the concept begins to be used specifically as a sociological concept. However, a theory of anomie only becomes consolidated since “Social Structure and Anomie” by Robert K. Merton (Merton 1938). The theory becomes important and conquers its space in the rest of the century as one of the most productive theories about deviance. In this study, based on a contemporary conception of scientific theory, that of the structuralist metatheory, a reconstruction of Merton’s approach is proposed, allowing to make explicit the deep structure of the theory.
References
Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U. y J.D. Sneed (1987), An Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Traducción castellana y edición revisadade Pablo Lorenzano: Una arquitectónica para la ciencia. El programa estructuralista, Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2012.)
Clinard, B.M. (ed.) (1964), Anomie and Deviant Behavior: A Discussion and Critique, Nueva York: Free Press.
Lorenzano, P. (2013), “Aspectos erotéticos del «hibridismo» de Mendel”, Contrastes. Revista Internacional de Filosofía18: 451-468.
Merton, R.K. (1938), “Social Structure and Anomie”, American Sociological Review3: 672-682.
Merton, R.K. (1964), “Anomie, Anomia, and Social Interaction: Contexts of Deviant Behavior”, en Clinard (1964), pp. 213-242.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Metatheoria – Journal of Philosophy and History of ScienceThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/