Diagramas y esquemas en y sobre la genética mendeliana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me8.164Palavras-chave:
Punnett, grafo, modelo, diagrama, representación, visualización, estructura lógica de las teoríasResumo
A pesar de su importancia creciente los diagramas, esquemas y bocetos aún son un territorio relativamente poco explorado en la filosofía de la biología. Se presenta un diagrama, en formato grafo-modelo, que recupera la estructura conceptual de la genética mendeliana. Este diagrama se usa como herramienta de análisis epistemológico de otro diagrama que puede ser considerado paradigmático en la genética clásica: el cuadro de Punnett.
Referências
Abrahamsen, A. y W. Bechtel (2015), “Diagrams as Tools for Scientific Reasoning”, Review of Philosophy and Psychology6(1): 117-131.
Aglioti, S.M., Bufalari, I. y M. Candidi (2014), “Multisensory Mental Simulation and Aesthetic Perception”, en Levent, N. y A. Pascual-Leone (eds.), The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 301-318.
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V. y R. Tytler (2011), “Drawing to Learn in Science”, Science333 (6046): 1096-1097.
Auden, W.H. y E. Mayer (1962), Goethe, J. W. Italian Journey (1786-1788), London: Penguin Classics.
Balzer, W. y C.M. Dawe (1986), “Structure and Comparison of Genetic Theories: (I) Classical genetics”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science37(1): 55-69.
Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U. y J.D. Sneed (1987), An Architectonicfor Science. The Structuralist Program,Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bateson, W., Punnett. R.C. y E. Saunders (1906), Experimental Studies in the Physiology of Heredity (Report to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, III), London: The Royal Society.
Bechtel, W. y A. Abrahamsen (2005), “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences36:421-441.
Bechtel, W. y R.C. Richardson (1993),Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Binder, E., Hagelweide, K., Wang, L.E., Kornysheva, K., Grefkes, C., Fink, G.R. y R.I. (2014), “Sensory-Guided Motor Tasks Benefit from Mental Training Based on Serial Prediction”, Neuropsychologia54:18-27.
Burnston, D.C. (2016), “Data Graphs and Mechanistic Explanation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences57: 1-12.
Burnston, D.C., Sheredos, B., Abrahamsen, A. y W.Bechtel (2014),“Scientists’ Use of Diagrams in Developing Mechanistic Explanations: A Case Study from Chronobiology”,Pragmatics & Cognition22(2): 224-243.
Casanueva, M. (1987), “La estructura lógica de la genética clásica”, Memorias del LVII Congreso de la Asociación de Investigación Pediátrica (México), Vol. I: 99-108.
Casanueva, M. (2003), Mendeliana, Iztapalapa, México: Editorial M.A. Porrúa-Biblioteca de Signos, UAM.
Casanueva, M. (2005), “Los modelos en la filosofía de la ciencia del siglo XX”,en López Austín A.(ed.), El modelo en la ciencia y la cultura, México: Siglo XXI, pp. 29-53.
Casanueva, M. y D. Méndez (2008),“Teoría y experimento en genética mendeliana: una exposición en imágenes”, Theoria63: 285-306. Casanueva, M. y D. Méndez (2013),“Graphs and Lattices as Conceptual Representation Formats. An Exploratory Exercise with Five Specializations of Mendelian Genetics”, Metatheoria3(1):19-37. Chandrasekharan, S. y N.J. Nersessian (2015), “Building Cognition: The Construction of Computational Representations for Scientific Discovery”, Cognitive science39(8):1727-1763.
Cheon, H. (2014), “Distributed Cognition in Scientific Contexts”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science45(1): 23-33.
Craver, C.F. y M.I. Kaiser (2013), “Mechanisms and Laws: Clarifying the Debate”, en Chao, H., Chen, S. y R. Millstein (eds.), Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 125-45.
Darden, L.y C. Craver (2002), “Strategies in the Interfield Discovery of the Mechanism of Protein Synthesis”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences33(1): 1-28.
Daston, L. y P. Galison (1992),“The Image of Objectivity”, Representations40:81-128.
Díez, J.A. y C.U. Moulines (1999), Fundamentos de la filosofía de la ciencia, Barcelona: Ariel.
Edwards, A.W.F. (2012), “Punnett’s Square”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences43(1): 219-224.
Edwards, A.W.F.(2016), “Punnett’s Square: A Postscript”,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences57:69-70.
Ferri, F., Frassinetti, F., Ardizzi, M., Costantini, M. y V.Gallese (2012),“A Sensorimotor Network for the Bodily Self”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience24(7): 1584-1595.
Galison, P. (2006),“Images Scatter into Data, Data Gather into Images”, enManghani, S., Piper, A. y J. Simons (eds.), Images: A Reader, London: Sage, pp. 236-41.
Gebharter, A. y M.I. Kaiser (2013), “Causal Graphs and Biological Mechanisms”, en Kaiser, M.I., Scholz, O. R., Plenge, D. y A. Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the Special Sciences,Dordrecht: Springer, pp.55-85.
Giere, R.N. (1988), Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R.N. (2004), “How Models are Used to Represent Reality”, Philosophy of Science71(Supplement): 742-752.
Giere, R.N.(2010),“An Agent-Based Conception of Models and Scientific Representation”, Synthese172(2): 269-281.
GlennanS. (2002),“Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation”, Philosophy of Science69:342-53.
Griesemer, J.R. y M.J.Wade (2000), “Populational Heritability: Extending Punnett Square Concepts to Evolution at the Metapopulation Level”, Biology and Philosophy15(1):1-17.
Griesemer, J.R. y W.C. Wimsatt (1989),“Picturing Weismannism: A Case Study in Conceptual Evolution”, en Ruse, M. (ed.), What Philosophy of Biology Is (Essays Dedicated to David Hull), Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer, pp. 75–137.
Jones, N. (2014), “Bowtie Structures, Pathway Diagrams, and Topological Explanation”, Erkenntnis79(5): 1135-1155.
Jones, N. y O. Wolkenhauer(2012),“Diagrams as Locality aids for Explanation and Model Construction in Cell Biology”, Biology & Philosophy27(5): 705-721.
Kozma, R. (2003), “The Material Features of Multiple Representations and their Cognitive and Social Affordances for Science Understanding”, Learning and Instruction13(2): 205-226.
Lakoff, G. y M. Johnson (1980), Methaphors We Live By, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. y M. Johnson (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.
Larkin, J.H. y H.A. Simon (1987), “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words”,Cognitive Science11(1): 65-100.
Lorenzano, P. (1995), Geschichte und Struktur der klassischen Genetik, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Mast, F.W. y A.W. Ellis (2015), “Internal Models, Vestibular Cognition, and Mental Imagery: Conceptual Considerations”, Multisensory Res28(5-6): 443-460.
Mendel, J.G. (1866), “Versuche über Pflanzen-hybriden”,Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereins zu Brünn, Abhandlungen, iv. 1865. (Traducción inglesa en: Stern, C. y E.R. Sherwood (eds.),The Origin of Genetics,San Francisco:W. H. Freeman,1966, pp. 3-49.)
Méndez,D. y M.Casanueva(2006),“A Reconstruction of Darwin’s Pangenesis in a Graph Format”, en Ernst, G. y K.-G. Niebergall (eds.), Philosophie der Wissenchaft –Wissenschaft der Philosophie,Paderborn: Mentis, pp. 157-164.
Moreau, D. (2012), “The Role of Motor Processes in Three-Dimensional Mental Rotation: Shaping Cognitive Processing Via Sensorimotor Experience”, Learning and Individual Differences22(3): 354-359.
Osbeck, L.M. y N.J. Nersessian (2014),“Situating Distributed Cognition”, Philosophical Psychology27(1): 82-97.
Perini, L. (2005), “Explanation in Two Dimensions: Diagrams and Biological Explanation”, Biology and Philosophy20(2-3): 257-269.
Perini, L. (2013), “Diagrams in Biology”, The Knowledge Engineering Review28(3):273-286.
Punnett, R.C. (1907), Mendelism, 2ndedition, Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes.
Rudwick, M.J. (1976), “The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760-1840”, History of Science14(3): 149-195.
Sheredos, B., Burnston, D., Abrahamsen, A. y W. Bechtel (2013), “Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?”, Philosophy of Science80(5):931-944.
Sollfrank, T., Hart, D., Goodsell, R., Foster, J. yT. Tan (2015),“ 3D Visualization of Movements Can Amplify Motor Cortex Activation During Subsequent Motor Imagery”, Frontiers in human neuroscience9(463):1-8.
Suppe, F. (1977), “The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories”, en Suppe, F. (ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 1-244.
Tversky, B. (2011), “Visualizing Thought”, Topics in Cognitive Science3(3):499-535.
Tversky, B.y M. Suwa (2009), “Thinking with Sketches”, en Markman, A.B. y K.L. Wood (eds.), Tools for Innovation: The Science Behind the Practical Methods that Drive New Ideas, New York:Oxford University Press, pp. 75-84.
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lee, P.y M.P.Daniel (2009),“Explanations in Gesture, Diagram, and Word”, en Coventry, K.R., Tenbrink, T.y J.Bateman (eds.),Spatial Language and Dialogue, Vol. 3,Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.119-131.
Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P. y J.Heiser (2000), “Lines, Blobs, Crosses and Arrows: Diagrammatic Communication with Schematic Figures”, enInternational Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams,Berlin-Heidelberg:Springer, pp.221-230.
Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J.S., Raczaszek-Leonardi, J. y F. Stjernfelt (2014), “Diagrammatic Reasoning: Abstraction, Interaction, and Insight”, Pragmatics & Cognition22(2): 264-283.
Van Fraassen, B.C. (1970),“On the Extension of Beth’s Semantics of Physical Theories”, Philosophy of Science37: 667-698.
Vorms, M. (2013), “Theorizing and Representational Practices in Classical Genetics”, Biological Theory7(4): 311-324.
Vorms, M. (2014), “The Birth of Classical Genetics as the Junction of Two Disciplines: Conceptual Change as Representational Change”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A48:105-116.
Wimsatt, W.C. (2012), “The Analytic Geometry of Genetics: Part I: the Structure, Function, and Early Evolution of Punnett Squares”, Archive for History of Exact Science66(4): 359-396.
Zenker, F. y P. Gärdenfors (2015), “Communication, Rationality, and Conceptual Changes in Scientific Theories”, en Zenker, F.y P. Gärdenfors (eds.),Applications of Conceptual Spaces,Heidelberg-New York-Dordrecht-London: Springer, pp 259-277.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Metatheoria – Revista de Filosofia e História da CiênciaOs documentos publicados aqui são regidos pelos critérios de licenciamento Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5
