The Minimal Method of Descartes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me3.77Keywords:
Descartes, method, scientific explanationAbstract
What is, after all, the famous method of Descartes? The brief and vague passages devoted to this subject in Descartes’ corpus have always puzzled his readers. In this paper, I investigate not only the two essays in which it is directly addressed (the Regulae ad Directionem Ingenii, and the Discours de la Méthode), but also his scientific works and correspondence. I finally advocate an interpretation that makes the best sense of his overt comments as well as of his actual scientific practice. Contrary to widely accepted views, I argue that there are no substantial discontinuities in his understanding of his own method, or between his theory and practice. I claim, by contrast, that Descartes advocated a minimal method: a method that says little, but that, nonetheless, marks a revolutionary rupture with the existing forms of explanation.References
Adam, C. and P. Tannery (1965/1975), Oeuvres de Descartes (nouvelle présentation), Paris: J. Vrin.
Beck, J. (1952), The Method of Descartes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Buchdahl, G. (1969), Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Clarke, D. (1982), Descartes’ philosophy of science, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Clarke, D. (1998), “Descartes’ concept of scientific explanation”, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), Descartes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 259-280.
Clarke, D. (2003), Descartes’s Theory of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D. and A. Kenny (eds.) (1985), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vols. I-III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garber, D. (1978), “Science and Certainty in Descartes”, in Hooker, M. (ed.), Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978, pp. 114-151.
Garber, D. (1988), “Descartes and Method in 1637”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 225-236.
Garber, D. (1998), “Descartes’ method and the role of experiment”, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), Descartes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 234-258.
Hatfield, G. (1988), “Science, Certainty, and Descartes”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 249-262.
Koyré, A. (1939), Études galiléennes, Paris: Hermann.McDonough, J. (forthcoming), “Descartes’ ‘Dioptrics’ and ‘Optics’”, in Nolan, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olscamp, P. (ed.) (1965), Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology, Indianapo-lis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Williams, B. (1978), Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry, New York: Penguin.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
LicenseThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
