The Materialist Commitment of Cognitive Ethology

Authors

  • Gustavo Caponi Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me16.441

Keywords:

cognition, behavior, cognitive ethology, physicalism, mind

Abstract

Although described in a language other than that of physiology, the mental phenomena, processes, and states that cognitive ethology seeks to identify and analyze are inscribed in the same materiality in which physiological phenomena are inscribed. This paper aims to argue that these phenomena, processes, and mental states are states of an organism that, besides affecting one another, also interact with the other states of that same organism, thereby predisposing and enabling it to behave in certain ways. Usually, however, the map of causal relationships linking these states and processes to one another, or to the behaviours they govern, is given to us in a language that refers to mental states, cognitive processes and behavioural responses, rather than to physiological states, processes and responses.   

References

Adkins-Regan, E. y S. Carter (2019), “Neurobiology, Endocrinology and Behavior”, en Choe, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 116-123.

Allen, C. y M. Bekoff (1997), Species of Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Andrews, K. (2020), The Animal Mind, London: Routledge.

Baravalle, L. (2019), “Manipulando sombras”, Disputatio 8 (11): 355-380. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3594058

Barth, F. (2021), “A Spider in Motion: Facets of Sensory Guidance”, Journal of Comparative Physiology 207: 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-020-01449-z

Bekoff, M. (2002), Minding Animals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bennett, J. (1991), “How is Cognitive Ethology possible?”, en Ristau, C. (ed.), Cognitive Ethology, London: Routledge, pp. 35-51.

Bernard, C. (1878), Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux, Paris: Ballière.

Breed, M. y J. Moore (2012), Animal Behaviour, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Broom, D. (2014), Sentience and Animal Welfare, London: CABI.

Broom, D. (2019), “Sentience”, en Choe, J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Animal Behaviour, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 131-133.

Bunge, M. (2005), Diccionario de Filosofía, México: Siglo XXI.

Bunge, M. (2012), Ontología II: un mundo de sistemas, Barcelona: Gedisa.

Burghardt, G. (2019), “Comparative Animal Behaviour”, en Choe, J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Animal Behaviour, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 94-98.

Cap, H. (2015), “Behaviour and Evolution: Crossed Glances”, en Heams, T., Huneman, P., Lecointre, G. y M. Silberstein (eds,), Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 471-497.

Caponi, G. (2014a), Leyes sin causa y causas sin ley en la explicación biológica, Bogotá: Universidad El Bosque / Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Caponi, G. (2014b), “El mosaico de Claude Bernard - la explicación causal en biología funcional”, Veritas 59(3): 567-590. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2014.3.16231

Caponi, G. (2018), Determinismo y organización: fundamentos y límites del programa de Claude Bernard, Bogotá: Universidad El Bosque / Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Caponi, G. (2023), Linajes, esas cosas que evolucionan, Bogotá: Universidad El Bosque.

Caponi, G. (2024a), “El concepto etológico de comportamiento”, Contrastes 29(2): 41-60. https://doi.org/ 10.24310/contrastes2922024

Caponi, G. (2024b), “La sintiencia considerada como habilidad cognitivo-comportamental”, Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia 24(49): 201-230. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.4643

Caponi, G. (2024c), “Las cuatro preguntas de Tinbergen en la Etología Cognitiva”, Ludus Vitalis 30(2): 113-140. https://doi.org/10.22370/lv.2024.30.2.4639

Caponi, G. (2025) “El concepto etológico de mente”, en Caicedo, O. y E. Niebles Reales (eds.), Filosofía Científica. Universidad del Atlántico: Barranquilla, pp. 257-309. https://doi.org/10.15648/eua.266

Darden, L. y C. Craver (2006), “Thinking About Mechanisms”, en Darden, L., Reasoning in Biological Discoveries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13-39.

Dawkins, M. (1980), Animal Suffering, London: Chapman & Hall.

Dawkins, M. (1990), “From an Animal’s Point of View: Motivation, Fitness, and Animal Welfare”, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077104

Dawkins, M. (1996), “The Scientific Basis for Assessing Suffering in Animals”, en Degrazia, D. (ed.), Taking Animals Seriously, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26-39.

Dawkins, M. (1998), Through Our Eyes Only?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, M. y A. Manning (2012), An Introduction to Animal Behaviour, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dugatkin, L. (2020), Principles of Animal Behaviour, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Fodor, J. (1989), Psychosemantics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ginnobili, S. y A. Olmos (2021), “Empirical Assumptions Behind the Violation of Expectation Experiments in Human and Non-Human Animals”, History and Philosophy of Life Sciences 43: 716-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00459-7

Gómez, J. y F. Colmenares (2010), “La causación del comportamiento: modelos clásicos y causas externas”, en Carranza, J. (ed.), Etología, Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura, pp. 41-62.

Gould, J. (2002), “Can Honeybees Create Cognitive Maps?”, en Bekoff, M., Allen, C. y G. Burghardt (eds.), The Cognitive Animal, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 41-45.

Griffin, D. (1981), The Question of Animal Awareness, Los Altos: Kaufmann.

Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hogan, J. (2009), “Causation: The Study of Behavioural Mechanisms”, en Bolhuis, J. y S. Verhulst (eds.), Tinbergen’s Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-53.

Hogan, J. y J. Bolhuis (2009), “Tinbergen’s Four Questions and Contemporary Ethology”, en Bolhuis, J. y S. Verhulst (eds.), Tinbergen’s Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25-34.

Kim, J. (1990), “Mecanismo, propósito y exclusión explicativa”, Análisis Filosófico 10(1): 15-47.

Lorenz, K. (1976 [1963]), “¿Tienen vida subjetiva los animales?”, Consideraciones sobre la Conducta Animal y Humana, Barcelona: Planeta-Agostini, pp. 395-341.

Mateos-Montero, C. (1994), “El bienestar animal: una evaluación científica del sufrimiento animal”, en Carranza, J. (ed.), Etología, Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura, pp. 493-528.

Millikan, R. (1993), “What is a Behaviour”, White Queen Psychology and other essays for Alice, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 135-150.

Olmos, A. (2018), El concepto de función y la explicación funcional de la Neuroetología, TeseoPress.

Palmer, S. y R. Kimchi (1986), “The Information Processing Approach to Cognition”, en Knapp, T. y L. Robertson (eds.), Approaches to Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33-77. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630816

Ryle, G. (2009 [1949]), The Concept of Mind, London: Routledge.

Taborsky, M. (2019), “From Ethology to Behavioural Biology”, en Choe, J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Animal Behaviour, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 99-102.

Tinbergen, N. (1955), The Study of Instinct, Oxford: Clarendon.

Tinbergen, N. (1963), “On the Aims and Methods of Ethology”, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20: 410-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x

Tinbergen, N. (1975a [1932]), “Sobre la orientación de la avispa cavadora (Philanthus triangulun Fabre) I”, en Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 109-135.

Tinbergen, N. (1975b [1935]), “Sobre la orientación de la avispa cavadora (Philanthus triangulun Fabre) II”, en Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 136-155.

Tinbergen, N. (1975c [1937]), “Sobre la orientación de la avispa cavadora (Philanthus triangulun Fabre) III”, en Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 156-210.

Tinbergen, N. (1975d [1962]), “Cómo distinguen las gaviotas reidoras entre los huevos y las cascaras de huevo”, en Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 328-339.

Tinbergen, N. (1975e [1967]), “La eliminación de la cáscara del huevo en la gaviota reidora común (Larus ridibundus): los efectos de la experiencia en la respuesta al color”, en Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 318-327.

Tinbergen, N. (1975f [1972]), Notas del autor a Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 105-108.

Tinbergen, N. (1975g [1961]), “La eliminación de la cáscara del huevo en la gaviota reidora común (Larus ridibundus)”, en Estudios de Etología, Vol. 1. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 267-317.

Tolman, E. (1951 [1926]), “A Behavioristic Theory of Ideas”, en Behaviour and Psychological Man, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 48-62.

Viera, C., Japyassú, H., Santos, A. y M. Gonzaga (2007), “Teias e forrageamento”, en Japyassú, H., Santos, A. y M. Gonzaga (eds.), Ecologia e Comportamento de Aranhas, Rio de Janeiro: Interciência, pp. 45-67.

Washburn, M. (1908), The Animal Mind, New York: Macmillan.

Wilcox, S. y R. Jackson (2002), “Jumping Spider Tricksters: Deceit, Predation and Cognition”, en Bekoff, M., Allen, C. y G. Burghardt (eds.), The Cognitive Animal, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 27-33.

Woodward, J. (2003), Making Things Happen: a Theory of Causal Explanation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Woodward, J. (2008), “Mental Causation and Neural Mechanism”, en Hohwy, J. y J. Kallestrup (eds.), Being Reduced, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 218-262.

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Caponi, G. (2026). The Materialist Commitment of Cognitive Ethology. Metatheoria – Journal of Philosophy and History of Science, 16(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me16.441

Issue

Section

Articles