Science and Religion in Michael Ruse

Authors

  • Alfredo Marcos Universidad de Valladolid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me13.330

Keywords:

darwinism, christianity, creationism, new atheism

Abstract

The relationship between science and religion is a central topic in Ruse's work, not a mere curiosity or a tangential question. It dwells at the very heart of his intellectual and vital concerns (section 1). Note, in addition, that Ruse's activity coincides with a certain historical crossroads, in which two extreme and mutually hostile positions confront each other: creationism and the new atheism (section 2). To understand the respectful, nuanced and constructive proposals that Ruse makes, it is necessary to situate them in a complex theoretical framework, where less crude attitudes than simple confrontation are possible (section 3). Perhaps the formula that best captures Ruse's ideas in this domain is that of “Darwinian existentialism”, as he proposes (section 4). Finally, I will present a conclusive summary of what was found (section 5).

References

Arana, J. (ed.) (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023), La cosmovisión de los grandes científicos, 4 vols., Madrid: Tecnos.

Darwin, C. ([1859] 1974), El origen de las especies, Barcelona: Ediciones Petronio.

Darwin, C. ([1871] 1973), El origen del hombre, Barcelona: Ediciones Petronio.

Darwin, C. ([1887] 1993), Autobiografía, Madrid: Alianza.

Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1989), “Book Review of Donald Johanson and Maitland Edey’s Blueprint”, New York Times, section 7, 9 de abril de 1989. Disponible en https://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/09/books/in-short-nonfiction.html

Dawkins, R. (2006), The God Delusion, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Draper, J. W. (1875), History of the Conflict between Religion and Science [disponible en https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1185/1185-h/1185-h.htm].

Giberson, K. y M. Artigas (2007), Oracles of Science. Celebrity scientists versus God and Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gould, S. J. (1999), Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life, Nueva York: Ballantine.

Livingstone, D. N. (2020), “¿Qué ciencia? ¿La religión de quién?”, en Brooke, J. H. y R. L. Numbers (eds.), La ciencia y la religión en el mundo, Madrid: Sal Terrae-UPCO, pp. 278-296.

Núñez de Castro, I. (1996), “Ateísmo o agnosticismo de Charles Darwin”, Proyección 43: 251-264.

Richards, R. J. (1992), The Meaning of Evolution. The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Ruse, M. (1975), “The Relationship between Science and Religion in Britain, 1830-1870”, Church History 44: 505-522.

Ruse, M. (1989), The Darwinian Paradigm: Essays on Its History, Philosophy and Religious Implications. London: Routledge.

Ruse, M. (2000), Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruse, M. (2007), ¿Puede un darwinista ser cristiano? La relación entre ciencia y religión, Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Ruse, M. (2010), Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruse, M. (2013), The Gaia Hypothesis: Science on a Pagan Planet, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ruse, M. (2015), Atheism: What Everyone Needs to Know, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ruse, M. (2018), The Problem of War: Darwinism, Christianity, and Their Battle to Understand Human Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ruse, M. (2019a), Monotheism and Contemporary Atheism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruse, M. (2019b), A Meaning to Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simpson, G. G. (1983), Fossils and the History of Life, Nueva York: Scientific American Library.

White, A. D. (1897), History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom [disponible en https://www.gutenberg.org/files/505/505-h/505-h.htm].

Published

2024-03-28

How to Cite

Marcos, A. . (2024). Science and Religion in Michael Ruse. Metatheoria – Journal of Philosophy and History of Science, 13(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me13.330