Enactivism and Emotion: A Way Out of the Cognitivist Crossroads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me12.314Keywords:
affect, cognition, emotion, enactivismAbstract
In this paper I intend to show how it is possible to approach the emotional phenomenon without subsuming the phenomenon by following existing standards, but rather by questioning them and contributing to the consolidation of a field of study of emotions with its own legitimacy. My purpose here is to present how the study of emotions could be favored by the revolution that has taken place within the framework of cognitive sciences, which, among other things, has given rise to the vindication of alternative ways of conceptualizing the mind and life in general.
References
Arnold, M. (1960), Emotion and Personality, New York: Columbia University Press.
Barrett, L. F. y K. A. Lindquist (2008), “The Embodiment of Emotion”, en Semin, G. R. y E. R. Smith (eds.), Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237-262.
Burdman, F. (2015), “El Post-cognitivismo en cuestión: Extensión, corporización y enactivismo”, Principia 19(3): 475–495. https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2015v19n3p475
Burdman, F. (2016), El Post-cognitivismo: El giro corporizado en filosofía de la mente y ciencias cognitivas, Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Calvo, P. y T. Gomila (2008), “Directions for and Embodied Cognitive Science: Toward an Integrated Approach”, en Calvo, P. y T. Gomila (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Science. An Embodied Approach, Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00001-3
Cannon, W. B. (1927), “The James-Lange Theory of Emotions: A Critical Examination and an Alternative Theory”, The American Journal of Psychology 39(1): 106-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1415404
Clark, A. (1997), Being There: Putting Brain Body and World Together Again. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998391
Clark, A. y D. J. Chalmers (1998), “The Extended Mind”, Analysis 58: 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01021.x
Colombetti, G. (2005), “Appraising Valence”, Journal of Comparative Psychology 12(8): 103-126.
Colombetti, G. (2007), “Enactive Appraisal”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9077-8
Colombetti, G. (2010), “Enaction, Sense-Making and Emotion”, en Stewart, J., Gapenne, O. y E. A. Di Paolo (eds.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 145-164. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001
Colombetti, G. (2014), The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019958.001.0001
Colombetti, G. y E. Thompson (2007), “The Feeling Body: Towards an Enactive Approach to Emotion”, en Overton, W. F., Müller, U. y J. Newman (eds.), Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1.1.63.7197
Damasio, A. R. (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, New York: Grosset/Putnam.
Damasio, A. R. (1999), The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness, New York: Harcourt Brace. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsp.2001.0038
Damasio, A. R. (2004), “Emotions and Feelings”, en Manstead, A., Frijda, N. H. y A. Fischer (eds.), Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49-57.
De Jaegher, H. y E. A. Di Paolo (2007), “Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005), “Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 429-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
Gallagher, S. (2005), How the Body Shapes the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-008-9108-4
Gibson, J. J. (1986), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, New York-London: Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.2307/989638
Hacker, P. M. S. (2009), “The Conceptual Framework for the Investigation of Emotions”, en Gustafsson, Y., Kronqvist, C. y M. McEachrane (eds.), Emotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584464_4
Hanson, N. R. (1971), Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science, New York: Harper & Row. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1739-5_5
Hurley, S. L. (1998), Consciousness in Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, W. (1884), “What Is an Emotion?”, Mind 9: 188-205.
James, W. (1890), Principles of Psychology, Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H. y T. M. Jessell (1997), Neurociencia y conducta, Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Kenny, A. (1963), Action, Emotion, and Will, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kenny, A. (1989), The Metaphysics of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Köhler, W. (1940), Dynamics in Psychology, New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Köhler, W. (1947), Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology, New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969660
Lazarus, R. S. (1982), “Thoughts on the Relations between Emotion and Cognition”, American Psychologist 37(9): 1019-1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.9.1019
Lazarus, R. S. (1984), “On the Primacy of Cognition”, American Psychologist 39(2): 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124
Lazarus, R. S. (1991), Emotion and Adaptation, New York: Oxford University Press.
Lyons, W. (1980), Emotion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609244
Maturana, H. R. y F. J. Varela (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition, Dordrecht: D. Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
Noë, A. (2004), Action in Perception, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Noë, A. y E. Thompson (eds.). (2002), Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.10185
Prinz, J. J. (2004), Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion, New York: Oxford University Press.
Prinz, J. J. (2005), “Are Emotions Feelings?”, Journal of Consciousness Studies 12(8-10): 9-25.
Rabossi, E. (1995), “Cómo explicar lo mental: cuestiones filosóficas y marcos científicos”, en Rabossi, E. (ed.), Filosofía de la mente y ciencia cognitiva, Barcelona: Paidós, pp. 17-39.
Robinson, J. (1995), “Startle”, Journal of Philosophy 92(2): 53-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940940
Robinson, J. (2005), Deeper than Reason, New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199263655.001.0001
Rowlands, M. (2010), The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Solomon, R. C. (1973), “Emotions and Choice”, Review of Metaphysics 27(1): 20-41.
Solomon, R. C. (1976), The Passions: The Myth and Nature of Human Emotion, New York: Anchor Press, Doubleday.
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O. y E. A. Di Paolo (eds.) (2010), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001
Thompson, E. (2007), Mind in Life, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/590596
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. y E. Rosch (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1965.tb01386.x
von Uexküll, J. (1921), Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere, Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-24819-5
Weber, A. y F. J. Varela (2002), “Life after Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Individuality”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(2): 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020368120174
Wittgenstein, L. (1988), Investigaciones Filosóficas, México: UNAM.
Wundt, W. (1910), Principles of Physiological Psychology, London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980), “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences”, American Psychologist 35(2): 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Zajonc, R. B. (1984), “On the Primacy of Affect”, American Psychologist 39(2): 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117
Zajonc, R. B. (2001), “Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal”, Current Directions in Psychological Science 10(6): 224-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
LicenseThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
