Historical Narrative as Performative Structuration

Abstract

Through an analysis of key insights from two central figures of philosophy of history, Louis Mink and Hayden White, this article tries to answer the following questions: firstly, why can narrative structure be thought as a cognitive instrument (Mink) for the historian?; secondly, why is narrative structure best approached as a product of a figurative operation of emplotment (White)?; and finally, why is historical narration’s cognitive-imaginary double nature – the production of interpretations of past events by endowing them with the meaning of plot conventions – best comprehended as a performative structuration? This last question sums up my interest in presenting a third way of thinking about historiography’s supposed hybridity elaborated from my particular re-working of Mink’s and White’s reflections with an important difference: I will not pursue the traditional line of thought of history’s scientific-literary hybridity. Instead, I will argue that we can approach historical narratives as cognitive and imaginary linguistic performances.