En búsqueda de los límites de la semiótica: desde el umbral inferior de Eco hasta la ecosemiótica materialista
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me14.365Palabras clave:
biosemiótica, ecosemiótica materialista, semiótica italiana, umbral inferiorResumen
Este artículo muestra cómo la semiótica ha superado sus límites en los últimos sesenta años, enriqueciéndose a través de la semiótica cognitiva, la biosemiótica y la ecosemiótica. En el primer capítulo, se examinará el concepto de “umbral inferior” de la semiótica, delineado por Umberto Eco, y cómo este umbral ha sido desafiado por la biosemiótica. El segundo capítulo explorará la semiosis como sinónimo de vida, criticando las justificaciones biosemióticas del límite entre vida y no vida. El tercer capítulo introducirá una perspectiva materialista de la ecosemiótica, cuestionando los límites de la biosemiótica misma. En todos estos casos, emerge una semiótica como disciplina en continua evolución, cuyos confines son constantemente redistribuidos y cuestionados, demostrando la vitalidad de un campo en perpetuo renovamiento.
Citas
Anderson, M., Deely, J., Krampen, M., Ransdell, J., Sebeok, T. y T. von Uexküll (1984), “A Semiotic Perspective on the Sciences: Step Toward a New Paradigm”, Semiotica 52(1/2): 7-47.
Ávila, M., (2020), “Design Responses as Response Diversity”, Biosemiotics 13: 41-62.
Barthes, R. (1957), Mythologies, Paris: Editiones de Seuil.
Bastide, F. (2001), Una notte con Saturno. Scritti semiotici sul discorso scientifico, Milano: Meltemi.
Bellucci, F. (2011), “Il mito e l’ultima soglia della semiotica: Barthes, Eco e la responsabilità della forma”, ponencia en Cultura, intellettuali e impegno, Università di Siena, Febbraio 23-24.
Calabrese, O. (2001), Breve storia della semiotica. Dai presocratici a Hegel, Milano: Feltrinelli.
Caputo, C. (2021), “Biosemiotics and General Semiotics in Giorgio Prodi’s Works”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4396/2021060V2
Cimatti, F. (2019), “Linguaggio e natura nell’Italian Thought: il dibattito sulla soglia semiotica fra Umberto Eco e Giorgio Prodi”, Àgalma 38: 60-69.
Cobley, P. (2016), Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics, Dordrecht: Springer.
Coole, D. y S. Frost (eds.) (2010), New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw2wk
De Landa, M. (1997), A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History, New York: Zone.
De Landa, M. (2012), “Any Materialist Philosophy Must Take as its Point of Departure the Existence of a Material World that is Independent of our Minds: Interview with Manuel DeLanda”, en Dolphijn, R. e I. van der Tuin (eds.), New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies, Michigan: Open Humanities Press, pp. 38-48. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/11515701.0001.001/1:4.2/--new-materialism-interviews-cartographies?rgn=div2;view=fulltext
De Jesus, P. (2016), “Autopoietic Enactivism, Phenomenology and the Deep Continuity betweem Life and Mind”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(2): 265-289.
De Jesus, P. (2018), “Biosemiotics, the Extended Synthesis, and Ecological Information: Making Sense of the Organism-Environmental Relation at the Cognitive Level”, Biosemiotics 11(2): 245-262.
Deely, J. (2006), “Let us not Lose of the Sight of the Forest…”, Cybernetics & Human Knowing 13(3-4): 161-193.
Deleuze, G. y F. Guattari (1980), Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie, Paris: Les Editions de Munuit.
Descola, P. (2014), “Modes of Being and Forms of Predication”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4(1): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.012
Eco, U. ([1962]1979), Obra abierta. Forma e indeterminación en el arte contemporáneo, Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
Eco, U. (1988), “On Semiotics and Immunology”, en Sercarz, E., Celada, F., Mitchison, N. A. y T. Tada (eds.), The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System, NATO ASI Series 23, Berlin: Springer, pp. 3-15.
Eco, U. (1990), I limiti dell’interpretazione, Milano: Bompiani.
Eco, U. ([1997]1999), Kant y el ornitorinco, Barcelona: Lumen.
Eco, U. ([1975] 2003), Tratado de semiótica general, Barcelona: Editorial Lumen.
Eco, U. (2007), “La soglia e l’infinito”, en Paolucci, C. (ed.), Studi di semiotica interpretativa, Milano: Bompiani, pp. 145-177.
Eco, U. (2018), “Giorgio Prodi and the Lower Threshold of Semiotics”, Sign Systems Studies 46(2/3): 343-351.
Fabbri, P. (1998), La svolta semiotica, Roma: Laterza.
Fabbri, P. (2021), Biglietti di invito. Per una semiotica marcata, en Marrone, G. (ed.), Milano: Bompiani.
Fabbri, P. y B. Latour (2000), “La retorica della scienza”, en Fabbri, P. Y G. Marrone (eds.), Semiotica in nuca. Vol. I, Milano: Meltemi, pp. 260-279.
Farina, A. y P. James (2021), “Vivoscapes: an Ecology Contribution to the Ecological Theory”, Biosemiotics 14: 419-431.
Garroni, E. (1964), La crisi semantica delle arti, Roma: Officina Edizioni.
Geist, V. (1978), Life Strategies, Human Evolution, Environmental Design, New York: Springer.
Haraway, D. (2003), The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Hoffmeyer, J. (1996), Signs of Meaning in the Universe, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, J. (1997), “Biosemiotics: Towards a New Synthesis in Biology”, European Journal for Semiotic Studies 9(2): 355-376.
Iovino, S. (2016), Ecocriticism and Italy. Ecology, Resistance, and Liberation, London: Bloomsbury University Press.
Krampen, M. (1981), “Phytosemiotics”, Semiotica 36(3/4): 187-209.
Kull, K. (2003), “Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: Building biosemiotics”, Cybernetics and Human Knowing 10(1): 7-20.
Kull, K. (2009), “Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones”, Cognitive Semiotics 4: 8-27.
Kull, K. (2022), “The Term ‘Biosemiotik’ in the 19th Century”, Sign Systems Studies 50(1): 173-178.
Kull, K., Emmeche, C. y D. Favareau (2008), “Biosemiotic Question”, Biosemiotics 1(1): 41-55.
Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network -Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2017), Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, B. (2021), After Lockdown: A Metamorphosis, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Latour, B. (2021a), Politiche del design. Semiotica degli artefatti e forme della socialità, Mangano D. y V. Bordenca (eds.), Milano: Mimesis.
Latour, B. y S. Woolgar (1986), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Cambridge: Princeton University Press.
Leone, M. (2009), “The Paradox of Shibboleth: Communitas and Immunitas in Language and Religion”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 1: 131-157.
Leone, M. (2012), “Bacteria”, en Favareau, D., Cobley, P. y K. Kull (eds.), A More Developed Sign. Interpreting the Work of Jesper Hoffmeyer, Tartu: Tartu University Press, pp. 33-36.
Leone, M. (2012a), “Motility, Potentiality, and Infinity. A Semiotic Hypothesis on Nature and Religion”, Biosemiotics 5: 369–389.
Leone, M. (2020), “Apuntes para una semiótica de la frontera”, Revista Chilena de Semiótica 12: 7-21.
Leone, M. (ed) (2021), “Volti Artificiali”, Lexia, 37-38.
Leone, M. (2022), “Generating Faces: Semiotics and Artificial Life beyond the Uncanny Valley”, Presentado en el Congreso Gatherings in Biosemiotics, University of Olomouc, Olomouc, 28 June.
Leone, M. (2022a), “What Semiotics Has to Offer: Entering into a Dispute with Semiotics’ Critics”, Відповідальна за випуск: 12-16.
Leone, M. (ed.) (2023), Il volto latente, Torino: FACETS Digital Press.
Leone, M. (2023a). “The Main Tasks of a Semiotics of Artificial Intelligence”, Language and Semiotic Studies 9(1): 1-13.
Leone, M. (ed.) (2024), The Hybrid Face. Paradoxes of the Visage in the Digital Era, NY: London, Routledge.
Lobaccaro, L. (en prensa), “Biosemiotica, semiotica cognitiva e sense-making: un approccio relazionale e pragmatista contro l’antropomorfismo”, en Suarez, B. Y M. Dentico (eds.), Biosemiotica: coesistenze tra vita e sostenibilità, Bogotà: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Press.
Mäekivi, N. y T. Maran (2016), “Semiotic Dimensions of Human Attitudes Towards Other Animals: A Case Study of Zoological Gardens”, Signs Systems Studies 44(1/2): 209-230.
Magnus, R. (2023), “Ecosemiotics: Signs in Nature, Signs of Nature”, en Coca, J. R. y C. Rodríguez Higuera (eds.), Approaches to Biosemiotics, Valladolid: Ediciones Universidad Valladolid, pp. 25-39.
Magnus, R. y N. Mäekivi (2023), “Ecosemiotic Analysis of Species Reintroduction: The Case of European Mink (Mustela Iutreola) in Estonia”, Biosemiotics 16: 239-258.
Maldonado, T. (1992), “Appunti sull’iconicità”, in Maldonado, T. (ed.), Reale e virtuale, Milano: Feltrinelli, pp. 119-144.
Maran, T. (2014), “Semiotization of Matter: A Hybrid Zone between Biosemiotics and Material Ecocriticism”, en Iovino, S. y S. Oppermann (eds.), Material Ecocriticism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 141-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt16gzq85.14
Maran, T. (2018). “Two Decades of Ecosemiotics in Tartu”, Sign Systems Studies 46(4): 630-639. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2018.46.4.11
Maran, T. (2020), Ecosemiotics. The Study of Signs in Changing Ecologies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108942850
Maran, T. (2021), “The Ecosemiosphere is a Grounded Semiosphere. A Lotmaninan Conceptualization of Cultural-Ecological Systems”, Biosemiotics 14(2): 519-530.
Maran, T. (2024), “Umwelt Collapse: The Loss of Umwelt-Ecosystem”, Biosemiotics 16: 479-487.
Maran, T. y K. Kalevi (2014), “Ecosemiotics: Main Principles and Current Developments”, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 96(1): 41-50.
Marrone, G. (2011), Introduzione alla semiotica del testo, Roma: Laterza.
Marrone, G. (2024), Della significazione. Testualità, tradizione, culture, Milano: Mimesis.
Marrone, G. (2024a), Nel Semiocene. Enciclopedia incompleta delle vite terrestrii, Roma: LUISS University Press.
Marrone, G. y D. Mangano (eds.) (2018), Semiotics of Animals on Culture. Zoosemiotics 2.0, Cham: Springer.
Monti, N. (2023), “The Unmeaning Machine. Cybernetics from Semiotics to AI”, Philosophy Kitchen 18: 89-103. https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/7834
Nöth, W. (1994), “Introduction”, en Nöth, W. (ed.), Origins of Semiosis: Sign Evolution in Nature and Culture, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-12.
Nöth, W. (2000), “Umberto Eco’s Semiotic Threshold”, Sign Systems Studies 28: 49-61.
Nöth, W. (1998), “Ecosemiotics”, Sign Systems Studies 26: 332-343.
Nöth, W. (2001), “Ecosemiotics and the Semiotics of Nature”, Sign Systems Studies 29(1): 71-81.
Olteanu, A. (2019), Multiculturalism as Multimodal Communication. A Semiotic Perspective,Cham: Springer.
Olteanu, A. (2021), “Multimodal Modeling: Bridging Biosemiotics and Social Semiotics”, Biosemiotics 14: 783-805.
Pagan, M. y M. Dal Pozzolo (2024), “From the Harmony to the Tension: Helmuth Plessner and Kurt Goldstein’s Readings of Jakob von Uexküll”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 46(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656- 024-00607-9
Paolucci, C. (ed.) (2007), Studi di semiotica interpretativa, Milano: Bompiani.
Paolucci, C. (2010), Strutturalismo e interpretazione. Ambizioni per una semiotica minore, Milano: Bompiani.
Paolucci, C. (2021), Cognitive Semiotics. Integrating Signs, Minds, Meaning and Cognition, Cham: Springer.
Polidoro, P. (2012), Umberto Eco e il dibattito sull’iconismo, Lexia 7, Roma: Aracne.
Posner, R., (2000), “Semiotic Pollution: Deliberations Towards on Ecology of Signs”, Sign Systems Studies 28: 290-308.
Puura, I., (2013), “Nature in our Memory”, Sign Systems Studies 41(1): 150-153.
Rodriguez Higuera, C. y K. Kull (2017), “The Semiotic Threshold”, Biosemiotics 10:109-126.
Rothschild, F. S. (1962), “Laws of Symbolic Mediation in the Dynamics of Self and Personality”, Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 96: 774-784.
Sebeok, T. A. (1963), “Communication Among Social Bees; Porpoises and Sonar; Man and Dolphin”, Language 39: 448-466.
Sebeok, T. A. (1988), “Communication, Language and Speech: Evolutionary Considerations”, en Herzfeld, M. y L. Melazzo (eds.), Semiotic Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the Third International Congress of the IASS Palermo, vol. II, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1083-1091.
Sebeok, T. A. (1991), Sign is Just a Sign, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (1991a), American Signatures: Semiotic Inquiry and Method, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (1996), “Signs, Bridges, Origins”, en Trabant, J. (ed.), Origins of Language, Budapest: Collegium Budapest, pp. 89-115.
Sebeok, T. A. (2001), Global Semiotics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Shannon, R. y W. Weaver (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL: Illinois University Press.
Sharov, A. (2024), “Semiotics of Potential Meanings”, en Sharov, A. y G. E. Mikhailovsky (eds.), Pathways to the Origin and Evolution of meaning in the Universe, Beverly: Scrivener Publishing, pp. 137-166.
Sharov, A. y M. Tønnessen (2021), Semiotic Agency. Science beyond Mechanism, Cham: Springer.
Siewers, A. K. (2014), “Introduction: Song, Tree, and Spring: Environmental Meaning and Environmental Humanities”, en Siewers, K. A. (ed.), Re-Imagining Nature: Environmental Humanities and Ecosemiotics, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, pp. 1-41.
Tian, H. y Y. Wang (2022), “Ecosemiotics and Biosemiotics: A Comparative Study”, Language Semiotic Studies 8(3): 1309-1344.
Vidales, C. y S. Brier (2021), Introduction to Cybersemiotics: A Transdisciplinary Perspective, Cham: Springer.
Violi, P. y G. Manetti (1992), Semiotica: Storia, teoria, interpretazione. (Saggi intorno a U. Eco), Milano: Bompiani.
Vogel, G. y H. Angermann (1977), Dtv-Atlas zur Biologie, 12. Aufl., München: dtv.
Wheeler, W. (2019), “Culture, Politics and Biology from a Biosemiotic Pespective”, Recherches sémiotiques 39(1/2): 183-203.
Zengiaro, N. (2023), “Latour and Biosemiotics. The Hybrid Notion of Life”, E/C Rivista Italiana di Studi Semiotici 37: 130-145.
Zengiaro, N. (2023a), “Gaia as a Living Text: An Ecosemiotic Analysis of Nature’s Correspondence”, en Özsari, M. (ed.), Geleceğe Göstergebilimle Bakmak, vol. 1. Balikesir: Balikesir Büyüksehir Belediyesi, pp. 318-338.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
LicenciaLos documentos aquí publicados se rigen bajos los criterios de licencia Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5
