Metáforas organicistas y mecanicistas en los comienzos de la Neurociencia

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me14.354

Palabras clave:

metáfora, organicismo, mecanismo, doctrina de la neurona, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, evolución

Resumen

En sus investigaciones, Michael Ruse destaca la relevancia de las metáforas en la ciencia, centrándose en el “abismo” entre las metáforas mecanicistas y organicistas en la historia y práctica de la biología. Ruse argumenta que la revolución darwiniana representó un cambio radical de metáfora en biología, pasando del organicismo al mecanicismo. En este artículo me propongo: (i) evaluar si la revolución neuronista, crucial en el surgimiento de la neurociencia moderna, implicó un cambio de una metáfora organicista a una metáfora mecanicista; (ii) destacar las influencias esenciales de las metáforas organicistas en la doctrina de la neurona de Cajal; y, en consecuencia, (iii) cuestionar la noción de un abismo entre metáforas mecanicistas y organicistas, al menos en el ámbito de la neurociencia.

Citas

Barberis, S. D. (2018), “Cajal’s Law of Dynamic Polarization: Mechanism and Design”, Philosophies 3(2): 11.

Bechtel, W. (2008), Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience, London: Taylor & Francis.

Bentivoglio, M., Cotrufo, T., Ferrari, S., Tesoriero, C., Mariotto, S., Bertini, G., Berzero, A. and P. Mazzarello (2019), “The Original Histological Slides of Camillo Golgi and his Discoveries on Neuronal Structure”, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 13, 3.

Black, M. (1962), Models and Metaphors, New York: Cornell University Press.

Boyd, R. (1993), “Metaphor and Theory Change”, in Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 481-532.

Cajal, S. (1891), “Significación fisiológica de las expansiones protoplasmáticas y nerviosas de las células de la sustancia gris”, Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Barcelona, 22-23: 1-15.

Cajal, S. ([1893] 2021), La retina de los vertebrados, editado por Nicolás Cuenca y Pedro de la Villa, Madrid: Editorial CSIC.

Cajal, S. (1894). “The Croonian Lecture. La fine structure des centres nerveux”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 55(331-335): 444-468.

Cajal, S. (1895), Elementos de histología normal y de técnica micrográfica: para uso de estudiantes, Madrid: Santiago Moya.

Cajal, S. ([1897] 2019), Reglas y consejos sobre investigación científica (los tónicos de la voluntad), Madrid: Editorial CSIC.

Cajal, S. ([1899] 1999), Texture of the Nervous System of Man and the Vertebrates (Vol. 1), Edited by Pedro Pasik and Tauba Pasik, New York, Springer Science & Business Media.

Cajal, S. ([1904] 2000), Texture of the Nervous System of Man and the Vertebrates (Vol. 2), Edited by Pedro Pasik and Tauba Pasik, New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Cajal, S. ([1923] 1989), Recollections of My Life, Santiago Ramon y Cajal, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

Caponi, G. (2004), “Georges Cuvier, ¿un nombre olvidado en la historia de la fisiología?”, Asclepio 56(1): 169-208.

Churchland, P. S. (1989), Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cimino, G. (1999), “Reticular Theory Versus Neuron Theory in The Work of Camillo Golgi", Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza 36(2): 431-472.

Craver, C. F. (2007), Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and The Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cuvier, G. (1798), Tableau élémentaire de l’histoire naturelle des animaux, Paris: Baudouin.

Darwin, C. (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: Murray.

Darwin, C. (1872), The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (Vol. 2), Boston, MA: D. Appleton.

Darwin, (1862), On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects, and on The Good Effects of Intercrossing, London: John Murray.

DeFelipe, J., and E. G. Jones (1992), “Santiago Ramón y Cajal and Methods in Neurohistology”, Trends in Neurosciences 15(7): 237-246.

Ferreira, F. R., Nogueira, M. I. and J. DeFelipe (2014), “The Influence of James and Darwin on Cajal and his Research into the Neuron Theory and Evolution of the Nervous System", Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 8: 1-9.

Fiorentini, E. (2011), “Inducing Visibilities: An Attempt at Santiago Ramón y Cajal’s Aesthetic Epistemology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42(4): 391-394.

Flourens, P. (1824), Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux, dans les animaux vertébrés, Paris: Chez Crevot.

Ginnobili, S. (2011), “Función como concepto teórico”, Scientiae Studia 9: 847-880.

Glennan, S. (2017), The New Mechanical Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.

Glick, T. (1982), Darwin en España, Barcelona: Editorial Península.

Golgi, C. (1873), “Sulla sostanza grigia del cervello”, Gazetta Medica Italiana 33: 244-246.

Golgi, C. (1875), “Sulla fina struttura dei bulbi olfacttoria”, Rivista Sperimentale di Freniatria e Medicina Legale 1: 66-78.

Golgi, C. (1885), Sulla fina anatomia degli organi centrali del sistema nervoso, Milán: Ulrico Hoepli.

Haeckel, E. (1866), Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformierte Descendenz-Theorie. Band 1: Allgemeine Anatomie. Band 2: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte. Berlin-New York: Gruyter.

Hesse, M. B. (1966), Models and Analogies in Science, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Kant, I. (1790), Critique of the Power of Judgment (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant), Paul Guyer (ed.), Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews (trans.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Kuhn, T. (1993), “Metaphor in Science”, in Th. Kuhn, The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Laín Entralgo, P. (1949), Dos biólogos: Claudio Bernard y Ramón y Cajal, Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe.

Machamer, P., Darden, L. and C. F. Craver (2000), “Thinking About Mechanisms”, Philosophy of science 67(1): 1-25.

Malanowski, S. and C. F. Craver (2014), “The spine problem: finding a function for dendritic spines”, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 8: 95.

Mazzarello, P. (2010), The Hidden Structure: A Scientific Biography of Camillo Golgi, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mazzarello, P. (2018), “From Images to Physiology: A Strange Paradox at the Origin of Modern Neuroscience”, Progress in brain research 243: 233-256.

Parker, D. (2018), “Kuhnian Revolutions in Neuroscience: The Role of Tool Development”, Biology & Philosophy 33(3-4): 17-42.

Puig-Samper, M. Á., García González, A. and F. Pelayo (2017), “La polémica evolucionista en España durante el siglo XIX: una revisión”, História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 24: 585-601.

Reiss, M. J., and M. Ruse (2023), The New Biology: A Battle between Mechanism and Organicism, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Reynolds, A. S. (2019), The Third Lens: Metaphor and the Creation of Modern Cell Biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Richards, R. J. (2004), The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ruse, M. (2004), “The Romantic Conception of Robert J. Richards”, Journal of the History of Biology 37: 3-23.

Ruse, M. (2005), “Darwinism and Mechanism: Metaphor in Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36(2): 285-302.

Ruse, M. (2021), A Philosopher Looks at Human Beings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sala Catalá, J. (1987), “Luis Simarro y el evolucionismo”, Investigaciones Psicológicas 4: 83-98.

Schwann, T. (1839), Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Uebereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen, Berlin: G. E. Reimer (English translation by H. Smith; New York: Kraus Reprint Co., 1845, reprinted 1969).

Shepherd, G. (2015), Foundations of the Neuron Doctrine, 25th Anniversary Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sherrington, C. (1949), “A Memoir of Dr. Cajal”, in Cannon, D. F. (Ed.), Explorer of the Human Brain: The Life of Santiago Ramón y Cajal (1852-1934), New York: H. Schuman, pp. ix-xv.

Spencer, H. ([1864] 2020), The Principles of Biology, Volume 1, Frankfurt am Main: Outlook Verlag.

Stinson, C. and J. Sullivan (2018), “Mechanistic Explanation in Neuroscience”, in Glennan, S. and P. Illari (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, New York: Routledge, 375-388.

Swanson, L. W. (2007), “Quest for the Basic Plan of Nervous System Circuitry”, Brain Research Reviews 55(2): 356-372.

Waismann, F. (1945), “Open Texture”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 19: 119-150.

Waldeyer, W. V. (1891). “Ueber einige neuere Forschungen im Gebiete der Anatomie des Centralnervensystems”, DMW-Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 17(44): 1213-1218.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-10-01

Cómo citar

Barberis, S. D. (2023). Metáforas organicistas y mecanicistas en los comienzos de la Neurociencia. Metatheoria – Revista De Filosofía E Historia De La Ciencia, 14(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me14.354