Base para una teoría semántico/pragmática de la información genética


  • João Queiroz Universidad Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
  • Claus Emmeche Universidad de Copenhague (KU)
  • Charbel El-Hani Universidad Federal de Bahia (UFBA)


Palabras clave:

biosemiótica, gen, información, Peirce


En este artículo presentamos algunas consideraciones sobre una interpretación semiótica de los sistemas de información genética, como una base para la elucidación del concepto de información, que carece en biología de una teoría que posibilite la comprensión de sus aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos. La teoría de los signos de Peirce incluye conceptos que ayudan a entender como genes en el DNA pueden tener una significación biológica para la célula. Con base en estos conceptos, hacemos un análisis semiótico de los sistemas de información genética.


Adami, C. (2004), “Information Theory in Molecular Biology”, Physics of Life Reviews1: 3-22.

Bergman, M. (2000), “Reflections on the Role of the Communicative Sign in Semeiotic”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy36(2): 225-254.

Bruni, L.E. (2003), A Sign-theoretic Approach to Biotechnology,Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen.

Colapietro, V. (1989), Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity,New York: State University of New York Press.

Cover, T.M. y J.A. Thomas (1999), “Information Theory”, enWilson, R.A. y F.C. Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences,Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 404-406.

Deacon, T. (1997), The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain,New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Debrock, G. (1996), “Information and the Metaphysical Status of the Sign”, en Colapietro, V. y T. Olshewsky (eds.), Peirce’s Doctrine of Signs –Theory, Applications, and Connections, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 80-89.

DeTienne, A. (2003), “Learning qua Semiosis”, S.E.E.D. Journal (Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development)3(3): 37-53.

El-Hani, C.N. (1997), “Explicações causais do desenvolvimento: são os genes suficientes?”, Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, série 3, 7(1): 121-167.

El-Hani, C.N. y C. Emmeche (2000), “On Some Theoretical Grounds for an Organism-centered Biology: Property Emergence, Supervenience, and Downward Causation”, Theory in Biosciences119: 234-275.

El-Hani, C.N. y J. Queiroz (2005), “Downward Determination”, Abstracta1(2): 162-192.

El-Hani, C.N., Queiroz, J. y C. Emmeche (2006), “A Semiotic Analysis of the Genetic Information System”, Semiotica160(1-4): 1-68.

El-Hani, C.N., Argyris, A. y J. Queiroz (2007), “Modeling a Semiotic Process in the Immune System: Signal Transduction in B-cells Activation”, TripleC[Cognition, Communication, Co-operation] 5(2): 24-36.

Emmeche, C. (1994), “The Computational Notion of Life”, Theoria -Segunda Época 9(21): 1-30.

Emmeche, C. y J. Hoffmeyer (1991), “From Language to Nature –The Semiotic Metaphor in Biology”, Semiotica84(1/2): 1-42.

Emmeche, C., Køppe, S. y F. Stjernfelt (2000), “Levels, Emergence and Three Versions of Downward Causation”, en Andersen, P.B., Emmeche, C., Finnemann, N.O. y P.V. Christiansen (eds.), Downward Causation: Minds, Bodies and Matter, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 13-34.

Fetzer, J.H. (1997), “Thinking and Computing: Computers as Special Kinds of Signs”, Minds and Machines 7: 345-364.

Fitzgerald, J. (1966), Peirce’s Theory of Signs as Foundation for Pragmatism,University of Notre Dame: Mouton & Co.

Fogle, T. (2000), “The Dissolution of Protein Coding Genes”, en Beurton, P.J., Falk, R. y H.-J. Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-25.

Freadman, A. (2004), The Machinery of Talk: Charles Peirce and the Sign Hypothesis,Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Freeman, E. (1983), The Relevance of Charles Peirce, La Salle, IL: Monist Library of Philosophy.

Gomes, A., El-Hani, C.N., Gudwin, R. y J. Queiroz (2007), “Towards the Emergence of Meaning Processes in Computers from Peircean Semiotics”, Mind & Society –Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences6(2): 173-187.

Griffiths, P.E. (2001), “Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory”, Philosophy of Science68(3): 394-403.

Hall, B.K. (2001), “The Gene is not Dead, merely Orphaned and Seeking a Home”, Evolution and Development3(4): 225-228.

Hoffmeyer, J. (1996), Signs of Meaning in the Universe,Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Hookway, C. (1985), Peirce,London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Hookway, C. (2002), Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Houser, N. (1997), “Introduction: Peirce as a logician”, en Houser, N., Roberts, D. y J. Evra (eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 1-22.

Hulswit, M. (2001), “Semiotic and the Cement of the Universe: APeircean Process Approach to Causation”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society37(3): 339-363.

Ideker, T., Galitski, T. y L. Hood (2001), “A New Approach to Decoding Life: Systems Biology”, Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics2: 343-372.

Jablonka, E. (2002), “Information: Its Interpretation, its Inheritance, and its Sharing”, Philosophy of Science 69: 578-605.

Jablonka, E. y M.J. Lamb (2005), Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life,Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Johansen, J.D. (1993), Dialogic Semiosis,Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Keller, E.F. (2000), The Century of the Gene,Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Keller, E.F. (2005), “The Century beyond theGene”, Journal of Biosciences30: 3-10.

Kornblihtt, A.R., de la Mata, M., Fededa, J. P., Muñoz, M.J. y G. Nogues (2004), “Multiple Links between Transcription and Splicing”, RNA10: 1489-1498.

Lizska, J.J. (1990), “Peirce’s Interpretant”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, Summer, 26(1): 17-61.

Maniatis, T. y R. Reed (2002), “An Extensive Network of Coupling among Gene Expression Machines”, Nature416: 499-506.

Marty, R. y A. Lang (1997), “76 Definitions of the Sign by C. S. Peirce Collected and Analyzed by C. S. Peirce, with an Appendix of 12 further Definitions or Equivalents proposed by A. Lang”, Arisbe Website, organizado por J. Ransdell. Disponible en: Acceso: 11 de enero de 2007.

Maynard Smith, J. y E. Szathmáry (1999), The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origins of Language,Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mayr, E. (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance,Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Merrell, F. (1995), Peirce’s Semiotics Now,Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.

Murphey, M. (1993), The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy,Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Neumann-Held, E. (2001), “Let’s Talk about Genes: The Process Molecular Gene Concept and its Context”, en Oyama, S.,Griffiths, P.E. y R.D. Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 69-84.

Nijhout, H.F. (1990), “Metaphors and the Role of Genes in Development”, Bioessays12(9): 441-446.

Oyama, S. (2000), The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution, 2aed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1aed. 1985.

Pardini, M.I.M.C. y R.C. Guimarães (1992), “A Systemic Concept of the Gene”, Genetics and Molecular Biology15(3): 713-721.

Parker, K. (1998), The Continuity of Peirce’s Thought,Nashville:Vanderbilt University Press.

Peirce, C.S. (1931-1935), The Collected Papers of CharlesSanders Peirce, edición electrónica reproduciendo los Vols. I–VI (Hartshorne, C. y P. Weiss (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1935) y VII–VIII (Burks, A.W. (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958),Charlottesville: Intelex Corporation.

Peirce, C.S. (1967), Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce(ed. porR. Robin), Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.

Peirce, C.S. (1977), Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (ed. Por C. S. Hardwick), Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C.S. ([1893-1913]1998), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. II,Peirce Edition Project, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C.S. ([1839-1914]1982-2000), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: a Chronological Edition, Vol. 2, Peirce Edition Project, Bloomington: Indiana University.

Pitombo, M.A., Almeida, A.M.R. de y C.N. El-Hani (2008), “Gene Concepts in Higher Education Cell and Molecular Biology Textbooks”, Science Education International19(2): 219-234.

Potter, V.G. ([1967] 1997), Charles S. Peirce: On Norms & Ideals, New York: Fordham University Press (The University of Massachusetts Press).

Queiroz, J. y C.N. El-Hani (2006a), “Semiosis as an Emergent Process”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society42(1): 78-116.

Queiroz, J. y C.N. El-Hani (2006b), “Towards a Multi-level Approach to the Emergence of Meaning Processes in Living Systems”, Acta Biotheoretica54(3): 174-206.

Queiroz, J. y S. Ribeiro (2002), “The Biological Substrate of Icons, Indexes and Symbols in Animal Communication: ANeurosemiotic Analysis of Vervet Monkey Alarm-calls”, en Shapiro, M. (ed.), The Peirce Seminar Papers 5, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 69-78.

Queiroz, J., Emmeche, C. y C.N. El-Hani (2005), “Information and Semiosis in Living Systems: A Semiotic Approach”, S.E.E.D. Journal (Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development)5(1): 60-90.

Ransdell, J. (1977), “Some Leadings Ideas of Peirce’s Semiotic”, Semiotica19(3/4): 157-178.

Ribeiro, S., Loula, Â., Araújo, I., Gudwin, R. y J. Queiroz (2007), “Symbols Are not Uniquely Human”, Biosystems90: 263-272.

Santaella-Braga, L. (1994), “Peirce’s Broad Concept of Mind”, European Journal for Semiotic Studies6(3/4): 399-411.

Sarkar, S. (1996), “Biological Information: A Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology”, en Sarkar, S. (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 187-231.

Savan, D. (1987-1988), An Introduction to C. S. Peirce’s Full System of Semeiotic,Toronto Semiotic Circle, Monograph Series of the TSC, Number 1.

Shannon, C.E. y W. Weaver (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Short, T. (1996), “Interpreting Peirce’s Interpretant: AResponse to Lalor, Liszka, and Meyers”, Transactionsof the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy32(4): 488-541.

Stuart, C.I.J.M. (1985), “Bio-informational Equivalence”, Journal of Theoretical Biology113: 611-636.

Tiercelin, C. (1995), “The Relevance of Peirce’s Semiotic for Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Science”, en Haaparanta, L. y S. Heinamaa (eds.), Mind and Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence (= Acta Philosophica Fennica 58:37-74).

Weiss, P. y A.W. Burks (1945), “Peirce’s Sixty-Six Signs”, The Journal of Philosophy42: 383-388.

Williams, N. (1997), “Biologists Cut Reductionist Approach Downto Size”, Science277(5325): 476-477.




Cómo citar

Queiroz, J., Emmeche, C., & El-Hani, C. (2016). Base para una teoría semántico/pragmática de la información genética. Metatheoria – Revista De Filosofía E Historia De La Ciencia, 7(1), 31–48.